The Logicality of language: Contextualism vs Semantic Minimalism
Guillermo Del Pinal
July 2021
 

The Logicality of Language is the hypothesis that the language system has access to a `natural' logic that can identify and filter out as unacceptable expressions that have trivial meanings---i.e., that are true/false in all possible worlds or situations in which they are defined. This hypothesis helps explain otherwise puzzling patterns concerning the distribution of various functional terms and phrases. Despite its promise, Logicality vastly over-generates unacceptability assignments. Most solutions to this problem rest on specific stipulations about the properties of logical form---roughly, the level of linguistic representation which feeds into the interpretation procedures---and have substantial implications for traditional philosophical disputes about the nature of language. Specifically, Contextualism and Semantic Minimalism, construed as competing hypothesis about the nature and degree of context-sensitivity at the level of logical form, suggest different approaches to the over-generation problem. In this paper, I explore the implications of pairing Logicality with various forms of Contextualism and Semantic Minimalism. I argue that, to adequately solve the over-generation problem, Logicality should be implemented in a constrained Contextualist framework.
Format: [ pdf ]
Reference: lingbuzz/006129
(please use that when you cite this article)
Published in: Mind
keywords: logicality, contextualism, semantic minimalism, semantics vs. pragmatics, 17 natural logic, modularity, grammaticality, triviality, quantifiers, semantics
Downloaded:102 times

 

[ edit this article | back to article list ]