The question particle ENN in Thuringian and its implications for the analysis of wh-drop
Andreas Pankau
March 2018

In this paper, I challenge Bayer’s (2010) syntactic analysis of wh-drop in terms of agreement and recoverability. I argue instead that the licensing condition for wh-drop is pragmatic. The argument I develop for this analysis comes from the behavior of the particle ENN in Thuringian. The particle ENN appears in wh-questions but also in yes/no-questions. So ENN cannot be an agreement suffix for moved wh-phrases. Yet it is obligatory in wh-drop. I argue that wh-drop is only licit in clauses that are unambiguously marked as questions. This derives that ENN is required in wh-drop because enn unambiguously marks a clause as a question in Thuringian.
Format: [ pdf ]
Reference: lingbuzz/003925
(please use that when you cite this article)
Published in: manuscript
keywords: dialect syntax, question particle, thuringian, special questions, syntax
Downloaded:102 times


[ edit this article | back to article list ]