Simplifying Match Word: Evidence from English functional categories
Matthew Tyler
February 2018
 

In work on the syntax-prosody interface, there is a prevalent idea that while lexical categories are preferentially mapped to prosodic words, no such pressure exists for functional categories (Selkirk 1984, 1996, 2011, Truckenbrodt 1999, Elfner 2012). In Match Theory (Selkirk 2011), in which syntax-prosody isomorphism is enforced by a series of violable constraints, this supposed pressure is built into the system with the claim that the Match Word constraint in some sense 'ignores' functional categories. I argue that this idea is misguided, and that Match Word does not discriminate between lexical and functional heads. The pervasive phonological reduction of function words, rather than being a consequence of Match Theory, is instead ascribed to idiosyncratic prosodic properties of function words specified in the lexicon. In particular, I adopt the model of prosodic subcategorization frames (Inkelas 1989, Zec 2005). This approach explains particular interactions that would be unexpected if Match Word were genuinely indifferent to functional categories, and fits in with a large body of evidence suggesting that functional elements can behave in prosodically idiosyncratic ways (Nespor & Vogel 1986, Inkelas & Zec 1990, Zec 2005, Bennett et al. to appear). The evidence comes from the behavior of several classes of English function categories: prepositions, auxiliaries, determiners, weak object pronouns and contracted negation '-n't'.
Format: [ pdf ]
Reference: lingbuzz/003869
(please use that when you cite this article)
Published in: submitted ms.
keywords: english, function words, functional categories, prosody, syntax-prosody interface, match theory, syntax, phonology
previous versions: v1 [February 2018]
Downloaded:48 times

 

[ edit this article | back to article list ]