Non-Obligatory Control with Communication Verbs: New Evidence and Implications
Idan Landau
September 2017
 

When occurring without their goal argument, communication verbs induce two types of control: Obligatory Control (OC) by the implicit goal, or Non-Obligatory Control (NOC) by a salient antecedent. Arguments are presented to demonstrate that the two are genuinely distinct, and furthermore, that the NOC option is not reducible to embedded imperatives. The two types of control implicate the same grammatical representations, the single difference being the choice of the context of evaluation for PRO (fixed as the reported context in OC, free in NOC). Finally, we present evidence (from VP-ellipsis) that reference to deictic antecedents in NOC is not direct but mediated via grammatically present entities (SPEAKER and ADDRESSEE functions).
Format: [ pdf ]
Reference: lingbuzz/003657
(please use that when you cite this article)
Published in: Submitted
keywords: control, speech act, communication verbs, syntax
Downloaded:147 times

 

[ edit this article | back to article list ]